🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to protect females from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a major setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries